"The suits allege that the companies violated Trump’s First Amendment rights in suspending his accounts and argues that Facebook, in particular, no longer should be considered a private company but “a state actor” whose actions are constrained by First Amendment restrictions on government limitations on free speech."

I don't understand how any attorney would be willing to bring such a ludicrous argument in front of the court. It's a massive embarrassment to the profession.

I find it even more dumbfounding that US judges will put up with frivolous nonsense like this without sanctioning the attorneys that brought it to their court.