The lie of expired food and the disastrous truth of Americas food waste problem
vox.com
vox.com
The obvious solution is to keep production at say 150% of demand but if we are going to do that then we are going to be ‘wasting food’ just like you waste time with all those database backups you never needed. The only difference is we went though all this hoop jumping to make the end user not waste so much food just to push the waste back down the line to the producers (which as the article points out are already throwing away a bunch of food themselves under the current system.)
All in, I would say this issue is close neighbors to the US switching to the metric system completely. Just not worth all the fuss and cost of doing it even though it has some feel good reasons for why getting to the other side of that big initiative would be worthwhile.
Then you get people complaining it's "ultraprocessed"
>so any excess past the target 150% (or other figure) can be donated easily to other parts of the world?
The logistics of this probably makes it more expensive overall than just donating bulk corn or whatever.
https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2019/12/23/7855667...
It's not the same thing as malnutrition because you're starving. One is death because your arteries are clogged. The other is death because you're body can't sustain itself.
We donate food that’s close to expiration to the local food pantry. They will take it after expiration, but they treat it separately and usually put it in the “free” table.