grftr.news is a politically motivated site for attacking the right. I wouldn't trust it any more than I would trust the other side, e.g. breitbart and fox
Isn't there a difference between attacking with well founded facts, and attacking with opinions and lies?
There is, but that's not what I'm talking about. Regardless of how well researched and accurate their stories are, if they ignore half of the lies out there, they are carrying implicit strong opinion, and doing everyone a great disservice. The site rightly goes after people like Tim Pool and Andy Ngo, but I guarantee this site won't say a single word about the constant lies and misogyny of people like Cenk Uygur, because they are more interested in pushing an agenda rather than righting wrongs.
And whom do you believe instead? A single study that can't be replicated because the data is fake.