What's wrong with books? They last a very long time and they don't require any electricity to be able to read them? Do you have studies that have compared the environmental impact of both?
2. You don't need studies to know the difference between a natural habitat and cultivated land. And that the former is non-renewable.
It looks like this comment is coming from one of those pulp-farming ambassadors spreading misinformation/whataboutism. This happens every time when a case for online publishing with direct payments to authors is put forward. Ha!
2. You need something to base your opinion on though, preferably peer-reviewed scientific studies.
You read way too much into my comment.