I can't imagine a compromise that I could reach with a teacher who believes the above that would make it less than parental malpractice to put my child in their classroom.
I can't imagine a compromise that I could reach with a teacher who believes the above that would make it less than parental malpractice to put my child in their classroom.
It is strange; if one were to imagine a white supremacist or similar figure in charge of education, and they tried to push forward a similar proposal to ensure that the disadvantaged were never taught true mathematics, they would be tarred and feathered. But by cloaking the initiative in the language of justice, people approve.
I've accepted for a while that people are not generally rational. But it's hard to accept the further realization that - and this is shakier ground, though it tracks with what I've noticed recently - many people don't seem to actually have beliefs. They have some vague set of heuristics that they use to respond to the world. Should evidence contradict their feelings or cause them to feel bad, they will deflect, dismiss, denigrate, and deny until anyone intruding on their personal reality simply gives up. Anything to avoid updating their priors. And I mean that in the least charitable way possible; this acquaintance of mine has refused to accept that there is a difference in importance or even kind between feelings and facts.
The knowledge that someone like this is an active teacher is horrifying.
That's...not a firm basis for the broad general conclusions you ret upon it.
You're right, from what I've understood. Instead, the humans are first and foremost social animals. Staying friends with the others, is what's important to them -- and one of their main heuristics, is, what do my friends (the others in the tribe) think? And to copy those opinions.
> Anything to avoid updating their priors
Changing ones believes, can abandoning one's friends? And historically (hunter gatherer tribes), that could mean isolation and extinction