Hacker News Reader

They don't have the "right" to, they have the "ability to do so without repercussions".

Exactly. Hence

> It would be more honest

There is a view, called “legal realism”, that what the courts and law enforcement collectively do _is_ the law itself. The rules as they are written down are useful in predicting or convincing how judges or other actors in the system will act, but that it all they are.