> My understanding is funds in a bank account were seized and the account closed. Describing the shortfall that followed, while they tried to recover said funds, as fraud, is a tremendous mischaracterization.
They covered up pertinent facts that would seriously question their liquidity and/or solvency.
Let me put it like this: suppose you were selling your house to me for $1 million. If I had $1 million in We Are Criminals Shadow Bank, Ltd., and I've been struggling for weeks to get them to give me any of my money back, how would you feel if I told you that I had $1 million in cash without mentioning any of those details? That's exactly what Tether did.
If you still feel that calling that fraud is a mischaracterization, well, I have a bridge to sell you. I mean, I've been having a bit of trouble with the recorder of deeds over it, but that should get straightened out any day now, so it shouldn't matter, don't worry about it.