And everyone jumped to conclusions that it surely was islamist extremist terrorists, al-qeada or the like. But no, it was a right-wing nationalist anti-islamist (apparently single) guy. I am so glad.
Also, given that Islamic extremists would be the most obvious conclusion, how is it unreasonable to draw such assumptions, especially when a supposed Islamic group claimed responsibility?
> Extremists and fundamentalists are all the same,
> regardless of what they're worshiping
Wouldn't this make it less likely to be Islamic extremists vs fundamentalists from <insert religion>? > given that Islamic extremists would be the
> most obvious conclusion
Because Muslims are more prone to being crazy and/or extreme than Christians (or people of <insert religion>)? Because Islamic extremists are the only people that use guerrilla tactics and explosive devices to get their point across?>> guerrilla tactics and explosive devices to get their point
>> across?
Until July 1997, the IRA carried out several bombing and
shooting attacks. These included the Docklands bombing
and the Manchester bombing, which together killed 2
civilians, injured 212 more and caused around £500
million in damage.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provisional_Irish_Republican_Ar... The Oklahoma City bombing was a bomb attack on the Alfred
P. Murrah Federal Building in downtown Oklahoma City on
April 19, 1995.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombingsigh.
> Man started writing ~5000 years back
and > Islam is a matured religion because it is
> written after Judaism/Christianity/Hinduism
relate to the post your are replying to other than the keywords 'Islam' and 'religion.'