> Seems like you are attempting to highlight edge cases in order to defend police corruption and their ability to hide their activities under the guise of public privacy.

I'm not sure where you're getting that from what I wrote.

I'm not saying police shouldn't use bodycams (I explicitly said I think they're a net good). I think there might be specific circumstances where not recording might be appropriate (e.g., if they're inside someone's house). I think those circumstances, if they exist, should be determined as a matter of department policy, and not left to the whims of individual officers, and that in circumstances other than those, officers should have to be recording at all times, and there should be consequences if they don't. Things officers do in public would pretty obviously be examples of that.

The only thing I was pushing back on was the notion that it's universally the case that LEOs should need to have cameras on for every minute of ever shift.