Yeah. The original claim by parent commenter is "I know many people with long-term VACCINE complications".
What that seems to translate to is "I regurgitate propaganda videos and claim that they're my first-hand knowledge"
Which is pretty sad, TBH.
What that seems to translate to is "I regurgitate propaganda videos and claim that they're my first-hand knowledge"
Which is pretty sad, TBH.
Why do it need to be first hand knowledge, if it is legitimate?
Why did they claim first-hand knowledge? because immediacy feels more convincing. A story in first person is more visceral. Why did they feel the need to "make it more convincing" like that? it's a tell.
I don't think they did.
The phrasing is intended to give the feeling of immediacy.