But they can't be because enough people don't share your worldview. Do you believe private communication is a human right? Well then you can't stop them communicating either. How would we achieve a world where these products and services could be universally banned immediately?
You are right, the problem is ethics. The problem is that it's not universally criminal to attack other countries' wealth.
If it came out that this group ran their infrastructure on IBM cloud, and you still worked at IBM, what would you do? It seems you think that the generation of wealth for IBM's shareholders is more important stopping genocide therefore it's okay to be complicit. So you seem to have some general notion of ethical total harm.
> The idea that terrorism (and black hat hacking is absolutely a form of terrorism) is a useful way to change corporate behavior is so ill-informed that it's pathetic.
It does change behavior, though, whether you like it or not.