The world is not near the end of the pandemic – epidemiologist Larry Brilliant
cnbc.com
cnbc.com
Having been interviewed, and then later seeing the interview in print, on a couple of occasions, I always wonder how conversations like the quote really happened. Here's how I hear it in my head:
Dr. Brilliant: "...and while there could be a 'super variant', there is an extremely low probability of that happening, so while..."
Interviewer: "So what you're saying is that it could happen?"
Dr. Brilliant: "well, yes, there's a non-zero possibility, but that doesn't mean..."
Print article: "Dr. sez possibility of super-killer-hide-yer-daughters-variant has 'non-zero probability' and we should all be very scared!"
The numbers are public. At some point, we have to treat this like other diseases we live with and go back to normal life.
We can both be in a pandemic and also not do anything about it if that’s what you want.
The big takeaway from Larry is:
a) elderly people with one or more comorbidities are a vulnerable population and will benefit the most from vaccination and additional booster shots
b) vaccine doses should be moved to developing countries with vulnerable populations that lack access to modern healthcare facilities
- "Brilliant said one group of people needs a booster shot “right away” — those who are 65 years and above, and were fully vaccinated more than six months ago but have a weakened immune system."
- "So those people, I would say, should be given a third dose, a booster right away — as quickly as moving the vaccines to those countries that haven’t had a very high chance to buy them or have access to them. I consider those two things about equal"
Whether we're near the end of the pandemic or not is just semantics and drawing a line in the sand right now is useless.