Hacker News Reader

Comment by theodorethomas | Hacker News Reader

I am trying to read your statement without concluding that you think that ignorance is a justification for a reputation.

View on HN

That's not my point. My point is that if a modern FORTRAN exists and almost no one uses it, then the reputation for FORTRAN for not being modern is justified because most people that will work with it will work with the old version.

-Building? That’s just bricks, old fashioned.

-But we can build with concrete and steel and plastics and all sorts now.

-Most people use bricks though. And people are not tearing their brick houses down to rebuild them in steel. See? Building is old fashioned, antiquated!

In fact, nobody now starts a new project in F77. There’s a lot of F77 brick code around, yes. And it still does the job it was asked to do even though it gets moved to a new district every ten years.

That sounds like a strawman. You're ignoring maintenance and adding features to old codebases. It's usually the majority of the work done. Sure, you don't need to recode BLAS as it's doing its job. But not everything is BLAS.

I am sitting here looking at a 50-line Fortran routine in our codebase that says

It has been revised since then to use free form, structured programming, MODULEs, KINDs, INTENTs and IMPLICIT NONE.

If we can do it, everybody can. I have already mentioned some reasons that people don't do it. None of the reasons I have heard are "Fortran is too old and clunky".

Considering that most Java codebases are still on Java 8, I'm not sure I agree with your point that "If we can do it, everybody can". Let's agree to disagree on that.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com