Hacker News Reader

This is what the article author states. But how certain are you that the dog didn't actually poop on the property or entered indoors?

The author stated before that there were no dogs on the property but was forced to admit that there was indeed a dog. It is therefore plausible he is also taking liberties at his other statements

View on HN

> But how certain are you that the dog didn't actually poop on the property or entered indoors?

If the renter had video cameras in the house, and the only image he could find of the dog was sitting on the porch, it probably wasn't because the owner didn't bother looking.

> The author stated before that there were no dogs on the property but was forced to admit that there was indeed a dog.

The author didn't have a dog. Someone brought a dog, and they stayed on the porch. The owner believes they caught the renter in a gotcha, but they didn't.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com