> We would not accept having breathalyzers in every car.
lol, that's not up to us. It's in the infrastructure bill.
https://www.mediaite.com/news/infrastructure-bill-could-requ...
lol, that's not up to us. It's in the infrastructure bill.
https://www.mediaite.com/news/infrastructure-bill-could-requ...
"If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever." - George Orwell
How long until general computing is given up due to hackers and piracy ala The right to read(https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html)?
Though requiring the driver to blow into a straw doesn't seem particularly "passive"--whatever that means.
But the text makes it seem like they would position cameras toward your face and do analysis on impairment indicators like eye movement.
Imagine a medical condition that makes it look like you are impaired. Now, you have to go to the dealer with a doctor's note to get this system disabled. Or when you want to rent a car.
Or, if there is a case when driving impaired would be better then the alternative. You and a friend are camping in the woods out of cell range, you both have some beers then one of you trips and gets a deep cut on the leg. Now you have to wait a couple hours before he can drive you to where you can get cell signal, hope you don't bleed out.