> I'd recommend a quick re-read of Adam Smith.
on that note, didnt "free markets" originally mean "free of rents", not "free of any intervention", correct? > I'd recommend a quick re-read of Adam Smith.
on that note, didnt "free markets" originally mean "free of rents", not "free of any intervention", correct?The "free" is on the forces of supply-and-demand, not a lack of regulations altogether (which is laissez-faire / anarchist). Wikipedia continues -- although with a bit of a non-sequitur in between, to explain that:
"All of these fields emphasize the importance in currently existing market systems of rule-making institutions external to the simple forces of supply and demand which create space for those forces to operate to control productive output and distribution."
Note that regulation is _external_ to supply-and-demand. It shouldn't interfere with the core concepts:
- Economic equilibrium
- Low barriers to entry
- Competition
- Spontaneous order
- Supply and demand