Not really a realistic suggestion though.
Not really a realistic suggestion though.
I think it is this one: 'Russian fires burned 4.7 billion trees, seven times more than were planted' https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/08/11/siberia-fire...
Just for the comparison 1 trillion trees project as of 30 May 2021, 164 restoration projects participate in the campaign and 13.96 billion trees have been planted worldwide.[7]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trillion_Tree_Campaign
And if we take that idea was founded in 1977 that means 44 years ~320 million trees planted per year...
And that damage is only Siberia, what with Australia, Canada, California, Alaska, Amazon ...
I do not know, maybe like a cancer patient, they can choose not to know or to know, and then either do something about it or nothing about it. And only very narrow path can lead to recovery, but only, and only if they have a will to live.
So, yes indigenous people used those techniques, to replenish forest but biologist say that 2019-2020 was not normal event. Especially considering number of animals burned was around 3 billion. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-53549936
So, of course they will stop burning when there is nothing to burn anymore, they will stop burning. Also our ability to plant new so far was not exemplary, and as I said, ability of sapling to sequester CO2 is very small. And each tree needs 15-20 years to grow to full size that can sequester more considerable amounts of CO2.
One more issue with trees worth mentioning is that past certain temperature, trees like humans, suffer a heat shock so they start dying. Which is again complication for growing new forest as saplings get exposed to higher temperature (not having collective cooling effect of fully grown forest) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pce.12417