I think the opposite is true here, and that treating Lindell fairly means not giving credence to nonsense.
I don't know if what Lindell has presented is nonsense. To me the presentation has been so bad that it's been hard to focus at all on what is/isn't being presented. Some of the people involved also clearly have their own agendas which is concerning.
From what I understand from reading much of the reports, it seems primarily to be a rehashing of many of the things that have already been presented.
I see Lindell as passionate person and it doesn't seem he intends to grift, but I think this symposium was massively oversold and I would bet that many conservatives, Trump supporters, and even Lindell supporters agree.
Curious what the downvotes are disagreeing with here.