Comment by corin_ | Hacker News Reader

Comment by corin_ | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

On account of the vast majority (not all, but most) landline area codes being five digits, that is the convention for splitting mobile codes too, so 11 becomes 5,6. Maybe not everyone knows it, but pretty much everyone I know does, from people who spent most of their life pre-mobiles (e.g. my grandmother), to frinds, to young children.

Even if you didn't conciously think this was the case, would you agree with me on which of the following looks the most natural?

  07920 748555

  0792 0748555

  079 20748555

  079207 48555

I'd argue that the natural option would be

07920748555

When writing it you might choose to add spaces, but that'd be for readability, not because of some notion of area codes.

It's clear even from the name that area codes doesn't apply to _mobile_ phone numbers.

Oh sure, it's for readability that you split it (or the equivilent when speaking) - but because the standard for splitting up a mobile number is the same as the standard for splitting up a landline, it's pretty well known that, if a form (or whatever) were to want your number split in two, then you classify the first five digits of the mobile number as the "area code".

London area code is 020, so I'd bet on "079 20748555".

If a website validates those two-box input fields, then surely it knows length of the prefix better than I do.

London is one of the few exceptions, not the rule. And even with the three digits, most Londonders I know split their phone number differently (for example "0208 XXX XXXX").

Reply on news.ycombinator.com