I host my personal site on OpenBSD and its built-in httpd, though in its current incarnation it's just serving static HTML. No, no HTTP/2, but if I cared about that I could install Nginx and use that instead.

httpd's config syntax is mostly sane and error messages are mostly legible, and that it's written by OpenBSD's core devs inspires confidence. I recommend that system admins at least give it a try, especially if they've already decided to use OpenBSD. It can't do everything but I think it does enough to meet the needs of 80% of the web's sites.

I’ve been running caddy on a FreeBSD jail proxying to another one running uwsgi+python3 and it has been a breath of fresh air.

Though, it comes with a somewhat steep learning curve.

But, in the end you can throw away that pesky search foo hat, and have some deserved peace of mind.

I use freebsd and nginx in production its a great system super stable

For most stuff http/2 doesn’t matter. I guess at some point they’ll want to add support for http/2, for now it not important unless your a fairly large site.

> Last time I checked httpd didn't support http/2

Some would argue that's a feature.