More than eighty cultures still speak in whistles
smithsonianmag.com
smithsonianmag.com
This person would be carrying a long stick in his hand with a black or white piece of cloth on its tip, waving it, as if telling the flying swarm to fly higher or fly down towards him, often with a “whistle” https://english.enabbaladi.net/archives/2016/08/mysterious-w...
It doesn't show them doing what you mentioned, but they all go into their coop on command
All of the episodes in this series are freely available online and on Amazon Prime.
https://intheamericas.org/works/210-whistles-in-the-mist-whi...
It’s not a loud, booming sound or anything, but I went from blowing soundless air for 20-odd years to actually whistling.
Thank you! That tip was all I needed to figure it out :)
I think it just takes a lot of practice and patience
Yea I went from being a mediocre whistler to crazy good at it when I played wind instrument seriously for a decade. But that was decades ago so now I'm back to mediocrity.
Also the word you are looking for is "embouchure"
Pucker Up - The Fine Art of Whistling
There is a short, but great segment where this is demonstrated with two men whistling across mountain tops to communicate.The film is filled with gems like one guy explaining as a compulsive whistler he got in trouble once for whistling a tune at a funeral.
(I should note I haven’t actually managed to watch the video yet, because my audio seems to be broken. Perhaps it would be obvious if only I could hear the whistles…)
Does it happen to you that when you think of a word in English, even if you don't vocalize, some of your vocal cords become tense or move? Well, these whistles feel the same.
Oddly enough, I haven’t ever perceived this, but I can consciously trigger it, and I do think I understand what you mean.
It's so surprising to me that English and most other languages don't make use of any clicking sounds whatsoever.
It was a rural area and he used it to communicate (come back home, usually) and as a child I could tell by the sound if it was a normal 'come home' or one where I was in trouble 'come home right now!'
I now have a child of my own and kind of wish I could whistle like that, though the utility would be much less living in a city with endless forms of electronic communication.
> Sochiapam Chinantec has three different words for whistle-speech: sie³ for whistling with the tongue against the alveolar ridge, jui̵³² for bilabial whistling, and juo² for finger-in-the-mouth whistling. These are used for communication over varying distances.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Whistled_language...
Do you still have a link to it? I wasn't able to find any examples by Googling.
How would one even generate a language to show whistle modes, you would almost have to use sheets of music :)
(I should note that’s not [s]; it’s [s͎] with an arrow below it. It’s hard to tell the difference with the font on my screen.)
My cousin trained a couple of black labs to be waterfowl retrievers. I saw him in training throw out a training "duck" and hold the labs at this side with just a look. Then he whistled and they took off. About 5 feet from the "duck" he whistled again and they stopped. The dogs wanted to get to the "duck" so bad they looked like they were vibrating. He kept them there for a good 30 seconds before whistling again to signal for them to retrieve it. It was pretty cool to watch.
Not quite as cool but we have a "shock" collar on our cat to keep him off the neighbor's porch furniture. Our neighbor is very, very allergic to cats. It is activated by a 10' diameter transmitter placed under their furniture and beeps like crazy for 10 seconds before it does anything - a couple of beeps sets my cat running.
For some reason (maybe after seeing my cousin do it?) I started doing a specific whistle pattern when the cat comes in the house with the collar on. That will now stop the cat dead in his tracks and he will wait for me to take it off. The reverse is true also - if he sneaks out of the house without it on I can do the same whistle and he will stop and wait for me to put it on him.
Or you know... you COULD walk over to where she is.
It wasn't disrespectful at all. It was a great way to communicate over wider distances than is possible with regular voice, and in retrospect it was impressive how little translation it took for all of us kids to understand which meaning was being conveyed.
I whistled to an ex SO and they considered it disrespectful. I'm not sure I yet understand why it's disrespectful, not that I consider either opinion more or less correct. I just don't really understand that opinion.
Maybe someone can expand on it?
Maybe my whistle wasn't a regularly used and defined "word" per se, but it was a clear and complete conversation.
Now that I think about it, I have different whistles depending on the situation. A high-pitched short whistle is usually "watch out". A short high-low-high whistle is usually reserved for friends to say "Hey, dude, look over here, I have something to say to you" usually followed by a non-verbal sign language, like pointing somewhere - "go over here" or "check that out". A low-high-low is for friends to more get their attention and let them know "I'm over here." The super loud whistle with your fingers in your mouth is "F-ing awesome" when you're in a crowd and the music group is playing a great song. It also has other uses. But mostly when there's a big crowd or the person you want to talk to is a long distance away. A bunch of high pitched whistles in a row usually means "danger/watch out."
There are other whistles, too. Just giving a few to illustrate how whistles are used right here in the good ole USA for communication purposes.
These are used infrequently, but I find most people understand what I'm whistling about and the different meanings of each whistle.
As it were, I've actually spent around a year on the small island of La Gomera, where Silbo Gomero comes from. All kids have it in school as an attempt to preserve it.
It is such an awesome compact language.
I’m still sad I never learned to use my fingers to whistle.
If you never heard it, this is where it came from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sbncTUZiGk
or this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRrw2hDjnl4 actually.
"still"?
Why is having more degrees of expressiveness in a vocal language considered an anachronism?
Looking back I saw he was actually on his mobile phone.
Other forms of communication are available.
https://www.languagesoftheworld.info/bad-linguistics/phonemi...
I don't think this is accurate. While it certainly does happen, new phonemic distinctions can certainly arise as languages change.
The article you link to does not support the idea either, in fact it explicitly contradicts it:
"Moreover, there is no bias towards decreasing the size of phonemic inventory over time as human populations moved out of Africa, as phonemes may be added as well as eliminated."
"That doesn’t mean that modern whistled speech is a vestigial remnant of those protolanguages, Meyer cautions. If whistling preceded voiced speech, those earliest whistles wouldn’t have needed to encode sounds produced by the vocal cords. But today’s whistled languages do, which means they arose later, as add-ons to conventional languages, not forerunners of them, Meyer says."
Did you think that passage was a total non-sequitur? Are they cautioning you from believing something you would have no reason to believe? Or do you think they were aware they had unduly created that impression.
I suppose if I say "we shouldn't assume people who comment on HN posts are sad, lonely, and grumpy" I'm not being offensive or disrespectful. After all, I never said outright that anyone was any of those things. On the contrary, it actually says the exact opposite
It's a trick of language called insinuation.
So identifying the minimum requirements for comprehensible, yet sophisticated, communication by sound would possibly shed light on what paleo-speech was like...
"Despite their interest to both linguists and casual observers, whistled languages are disappearing rapidly all over the world, and some — such as the whistled form of the Tepehua language in Mexico — have already vanished. Modernization is largely to blame, says Meyer, who points to roads as the biggest factor. “That’s why you still find whistled speech only in places that are very, very remote, that have had less contact with modernity, less access to roads,” he says."
I'd replace "blame" with "thank": the simpler languages can become, and the fewer of them in daily use we can get to globally, the better for the entire species.
I'd love an expressive and terse baseline human language.
No problem if people still use other languages too, for cultural or historical reasons.
But having a multilingual globe comes at a massive, immeasurable cost.
One of the greatest forces to improve economic opportunity and equality in the history of the world would be if everybody suddenly agreed on one simple, terse, expressive human language and switched to it, in all contexts except home life and shared spiritual or community services.
No more IELTS tests, no more spelling bees, no more "why is 'wherefore art thou' not about Romeo's location?", no more notarized translation costs everywhere in the world... everybody gets equal access to all media created in all places (although of course there'll still be place-specific references in that media), etc
If you were designing an ideal human world, the last thing you'd want to do is build a Tower of Babel on it.
I suspect this is one of those "pick two, at best" situations.