I don't really understand that statement, can someone please explain it to me?
I think he's trying to say that programmers make more comprehensive tools for other engineering fields than the ones they use.
Fred Brooks' essay "No Silver Bullet" has a list of past breakthroughs. These are examples of applying programming to programming to ease cognitive load 10x. The essay predicts that we won't see any more of those types of improvements. But we haven't even scratched the surface when it comes to the CAD and SIM tooling for programming. There are many silver bullets left to build.
https://www.quora.com/How-does-one-get-as-close-as-possible-...
The entire comment chain is interesting to get some insight into how he's thinking about Engineering.