The Queer Past Gets Deleted on eBay
newyorker.com
newyorker.com
I would offer a defence of the New Yorker's slightly NSFW content here. With it they're slightly breaking the same taboo that has led to all this content being purged from eBay. I suppose it makes argument that it's of historical and artistic significance despite its explicitness. Most of early LGBT cultural artifacts are, perhaps unsurprisingly, heavily sexualized with no clear professional/nonprofessional boundary as we might see it today. And so it all goes on the ban list. From the porn, to the personal ads, to the interviews, op eds, advertisements, and news too. Because they were all bound up together in the likes of Drummer magazine.
° tongue firmly in cheek
Who's funding that?
From [0]
> Why does eBay have this policy?
> We want to make adult items available to those who wish to purchase them and can do so legally, while preventing those who do not wish to view or purchase these items from easily accessing them.
Do I also use the same 'private platform argument' here as well?
[0] https://www.ebay.com/help/policies/prohibited-restricted-ite...