Strange argument:
- government may use this in future to tag people for wrongthink imagery, but also
- CP is rampant on FB and FB reports it all but nothing happens so what difference does it make
- government may use this in future to tag people for wrongthink imagery, but also
- CP is rampant on FB and FB reports it all but nothing happens so what difference does it make
Could a government not have a different level of interest in law enforcement over CP vs, say, political material that undermines government authority?
Indeed; I'm not sure this premise holds. I personally don't trust Apple's promises on privacy given its actions in China shows that it values market access more than its privacy values. But I find this argument weak.