Why aren't house prices included in CPI?
economics.stackexchange.com
economics.stackexchange.com
Another way of keeping the CPI down is to substitute cheaper items in place of the previous more expensive things. So if a pound of hamburger mince is no more expensive than a pound of prime steak used to be, there is officially "no inflation".
Inflation is really a tax. It's tax on your wages, it's a tax on your savings. But it's a stealth tax that most people don't even consider to be a tax at all.
One simple way of looking things: This year you have $100, one year later, with an inflation rate of 3%, your $100 can now only buy about $97 worth of goods. (It would cost you $103 in a year's time to buy what you can buy today for $100.) What happened to that $3? It has evaporated as a stealth tax.
Keep that $100 for enough years, and it will then be only worth ONE single today's dollar. I calculated recently, that with 50 years of inflation since Nixon took the US off the gold standard back in 1971, it would take THIRTY-EIGHT 2021 dollars to buy what just ONE 1971 dollar would buy.
Let's say my budget for housing is $1000 per month and I want a 30 year mortgage. That means I will pay $360000 for my house, no matter the interest rate, no matter the price of the house.
If the interest rate is 5% then the bank will take around $170k in interest over the total duration of the loan. There is $190k left over for the house.
When interest is 2.5% then the bank will take around 110k in interest, leaving $250k to buy the home.
Once interest is 0% the bank won't take anything, you get to buy the exact same home for $360k.
The price of your home is completely disconnected from what you pay for it.
If you were to include the price of houses in the CPI then the CPI would no longer measure the consumer price of anything.