It is measuring the effectiveness of the public policy and comparing how it differs when the masks distributed were cloth versus surgical. There is nothing in this report about the effectiveness of masks on an individual level.
It is measuring the effectiveness of the public policy and comparing how it differs when the masks distributed were cloth versus surgical. There is nothing in this report about the effectiveness of masks on an individual level.
The DANMASK RCT [1] provided a direct test of masks as personal protective equipment, and found no support for masks. The criticism of that study, at that time, was that it didn't test the hypothesis of protecting others. So here we have an RCT that tests that hypothesis, and now that's not good enough, because the results aren't "at an individual level"?
Boy, the ground sure is slippery around here!
https://www.poverty-action.org/sites/default/files/publicati...