Hacker News Reader

Comment by ren_engineer | Hacker News Reader

the point is you are still wasting your time and your life on stuff that has no practical value for 95% of developers. You are spending a huge chunk of time learning skills that have no use beyond the interview itself.

View on HN

Yeah and then you get paid 350k at 24. I’m glad we’re in an industry where you can become incredibly well paid by spending a few months studying for a standardised, albeit unofficial, test. Much better than the CFA investment bankers, accountants, law school grads, etc.

Wow I wish I was paid anything near that. I don't know how many outside of the US get that well paid.

This. And there are plenty of high paying companies that will respect your time better than FAANG.

I disagree with this - here's my experience. I started training for competitive programming in college. One semester in particular I spent 20-30 hours a week training, and some of my grades suffered as a result. But I got a lot better at algorithms. Years later, what skills do I remember from college? Very little, but I definitely remember the algorithms. Further, converting specifications to code and general problem solving became noticeably easier after this period. As a result, the jobs I've had have centered on problem-solving and interesting technical challenges. I'm always surprised when an idea from that period suddenly proves itself useful.

Also, even if training for algorithms questions was purely a matter of signaling with no positive externalities - it's actually a much faster and easier process than getting another degree, which is a common alternative.

TL;DR If you put in the time, it can absolutely change your trajectory in ways that you might like a lot. If you don't, how will you know?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com