You can demand higher employee compensation all you like, but customers will be the ones paying for it, as they pay for all costs that the business incurs (if the owners want to stay in business anyway).
You can demand higher employee compensation all you like, but customers will be the ones paying for it, as they pay for all costs that the business incurs (if the owners want to stay in business anyway).
Low margin is not no margin. As long as there is a margin, this remains true for some level of cost increases.
And your example is excessively reductive. Say the $3 company can't actually retain any workers because their pay is so bad. They will not be serving any $3 coffees, so it's not a threat to the $10 coffees. Also, your example prices sure are, uh, interesting and hard not to read in to.
> Say the $3 company can't actually retain any workers because their pay is so bad. They will not be serving any $3 coffees, so it's not a threat to the $10 coffees.
The $3/coffee company will likely still find workers who are willing to work for what the company is willing to pay. Thus there is a market-established price for the labor and the floor is a legislatively-established price-control called the minimum wage. It’s not high skill work and you can train someone in a day to operate a drip brewer and an espresso machine.
> Also, your example prices sure are, uh, interesting and hard not to read in to.
There’s nothing much to read into there. I rounded up the $3 option to be generous to the opposition and overstated with the $10 option as a point of comparison that you cannot simply arbitrarily charge more without additional value-add and expect to retain your customers. Seniors on fixed incomes will complain all day about coffee costing even $2, or a single cappuccino going from $2.25 to $3.5 over the course of a few years.