I don't disagree with you, but Occam's razor is a principle; a guideline. Not a hard law. From the panpsychic perspective all matter is conscious making everything a "subjective observer," which solves the same problem of humans being arbitrary special observers. Unprovable philosophical dead-end? Sure. Woo? Nah.
this is why I said "implies". I fully acknowledge that in principle QM and human minds might be intimately boundm but that, like panpsychism is effectively ipossible to prove or disprove in our current scientific framework.
I don’t follow.
Perhaps we are using “theory of” in different ways?
Probably. I'm using the technical, scientific definition.
What I mean is, “technical account/description of”
Scientific theories are explanations for ("why"), not passive descriptions.