> many are still* unwilling to use Boost*
I can appreciate the subtlety of wording, but in reality it is more of
> many will never be touching Boost even with a long pole and for a large sum of money
:)
I can appreciate the subtlety of wording, but in reality it is more of
> many will never be touching Boost even with a long pole and for a large sum of money
:)
I respect people's decision, I guess I just don't understand it.
That said, boost is a dependency that pays off in terms of programmer time if what you're doing is complicated enough (in other words, if you think you might reimplement some part of boost, you're better off using it as a dependency instead.)