The linked Google doc is not reasonable, it sounds reasonable because it is a one-sided depiction of the situation that is a) wordy b) completely omits the other side and c) is written in a style that resonates with CoC enforcers.
IOW, the most ruthless and stylistically talented person wins.
Here is the conversation that triggered the tribunal:
If that is a reason for a ban, you can ban 50% of people at Google and 100% of people at Google hired before 2010.