Hacker News Reader

I think you misunderstood, or I am misunderstanding what you are trying to communicate. There would be no attempt to change any syntax within macro calls. All token trees fed into any macro would be fed directly with the exception of the implied braces when indenting the call.

View on HN

In your println! example, you’ve written Analog syntax, but it must be being translated into Rust syntax for the macro to consume. How are you going to decide what to translate and what not to?

Perhaps I might put it this way instead: can you write out for me what an invocation of that alpha macro (which is defined in Rust code) from Analog might look like?

You are absolutely correct, apologies I just saw it now. It was a remnant that got left over.

I now see the issue this raises and have discovered a solution through a macro!! call.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com