Where did you get that this is being marketed for production? Did you just assume that because the site looks nice?
Handy tip: languages that are marketed for use in the real world tend to advertise actual uses in the real world.
Handy tip: languages that are marketed for use in the real world tend to advertise actual uses in the real world.
My point/question was: it doesn't add a runtime or new libraries/routines, you can read the generated code if something goes wrong, so why wouldn't it be ok to use in production?
On the contrary, at the very top of the page, albeit in extremely poor contrast, it says "A programmer friendly language". That certainly implies the author considers it to be good for something other than "playing with new syntax".