Hacker News Reader

Hacker News

Comment by stevehind | Hacker News Reader

Full thread

stevehind

Hmm turns out trustless and decentralised might not be the best model for all financial infrastructure.

View on HN

Rai Stones worked really well, for a long time. Well, except for the one that fell off the outrigger.

I thought it worked even better because you didn't actually have to move it anymore.

A early variant of trading gold or pork futures!

honestly I can see bitcoin ending up like this, actually transacting the bitcoins is too expensive: lets just build an accounting system where we keep a database entry of who owns a particular address

(Did I just invent the lightning network or nah?)

Good thing precisely zero people are proposing this for "all financial infrastructure".

It's an opt-in alternative, nothing more. If you don't want to use it, nothing forces you to (unlike existing retail banking).

Do the people opting in truly appreciate that one software bug could empty their account?

People who interact with non-bitcoin crypto tend to be a lot more knowledgable about the tech and its implications than an average person. So I would say the answer is probably yes.

Ah yes. All the geniuses that are around the crypto subreddits for example. Definitely Turing award level.

I didn't say they were geniuses, just that they were more familiar with the tech and its implications than the average person. Smart contracts have been around for a while and we basically know the scope of the catastrophes that can result from bugs in smart contract code. The DAO hack was years ago. This is not a new problem space

Most all of the people in defi do, yes. It's happened a number of times now, so you'd have to work pretty hard to understand enough to use defi but not be aware of the risks.

It's mandatory in El Salvador. That alone is a QED. However, I'd highly recommend listening to any of the thought leader talking heads.

its mandatory _for businesses to accept BTC_ not for the populace to use it.

This is an irrelevant point and borderline strawman. Considering the environmental impact of proof of stake blockchains, everyone is impacted whether they use crypto or not.

The environmental impact of proof of stake blockchains is virtually nonexistent.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com