There is a small number which is but yes, that hardly visible.
> Why are you on HN asking what you're missing
It's a good channel for this type of feedback.
> Ask the people who you want to use it..
We've been working in this industry since 2014 and have talked with literally 1000s of cannabis licensees; they know they need this (regulatory obligation); when they have Metrc they hate it; and it doesn't carry the proper data forward; and folks get stuck with teidous manual data entry -- so they feel the pain every day. The customers we have on our hosted solution, one of our big selling points is trying to build the industry together with open specifications. When Washington state had another issue with their cannabis software in late 2017, an industry assocation made efforts to introduce this open specification at that time. Some of our competitors (not in Washington) have even purchased consulting time from us to talk about general system design for cannabis industry software -- it's where we also got some of that feedback for the existing models.
So, we are, and have been, and continue to be activily engaged in conversations with industry participants many of whom actively find us to bring their problems to; and we turn those into the virtious cycle customer feedback loop.
I know it's common in the "tech space" to have folks put the cart in front of the horse. I think our case does NOT do that; since 2014 a profitable customer driven company; starting the open-source efforts in 2016 in a constant, customer engaged method. It's why our competitors and our competitors clients literally call us for help.