As the article pointed out, they didn't defend themselves. They simply attempted to discredit the whistleblower, and change the subject.
Let them defend themselves without character assassination, please.
Let them defend themselves without character assassination, please.
Where does it mention her character??
She leaked 18k documents. How does the number of direct reports she supervised affect their veracity?
Generally after hacking a company, the documents are provided in a ZIP for everyone to download. Information wants to be free, but we are only being provided with her summary of the documents rather than the evidence itself.
How? Where?