> So instead of improving it, you suggest to automate it?
I said no such thing. Read the whole thing again, take the upset level down a few notches and get back to us.
I said no such thing. Read the whole thing again, take the upset level down a few notches and get back to us.
This is were I'm at:
You brought up the fact that FR could identify criminals. I brought up the fact it could also identify innocent people as criminals. When innocent people are accused of crimes they didn't do, they usually get upset.
I didn't say I personally was upset with your message. I said they would get upset. I'm not a "people" person, but this should be obvious. And I think I would be upset too if I got accused of something I didn't do.
You still didn't tell me how you would resolve an innocent person being misidentified by a facial recognition system. Can they sue the company or person who developed it?
Due process, which they'll still be entitled to.
Not sure about suing. I'm sure people will try and sue.