The judge, Davenport, sounds like an insane person.
(It's very tempting to regard people we strongly disagree with as insane, but it's a mistake that both impairs dealing with actual mental illness compassionately and fighting them politically. She's perfectly rational and sane, she's just reasoning from a set of beliefs and emotional values that you find abhorrent)
If stats were available to show black children in general were targeted, the piece would have included them.
Including 'Black children' in the title is unnecessary other than one of the arresting officers in this particular case wondered would this(arresting/cuffing at school over being an observer) happen in a white school.
She's an idiot. She may also be a racist but the article doesn't provide any evidence for that.
I wonder sometimes if people ever read past the headline and first paragraph.
Sure, the only evidence we have of racial targeting is anecdotal, but if we use a Bayesian approach, the fact that the party that is conducting the profiling shuts off the data that would disprove that notion, it gives us a very strong prior.