If that's the case, I don't really understand what either HP or anyone else would get out of it being licensed to other manufacturers.
If that's the case, I don't really understand what either HP or anyone else would get out of it being licensed to other manufacturers.
You know, all that stuff that Linux users have a hard time caring about but really appeal to regular people and devs.
I guess my question is closer to, how is webOS hard to duplicate? How is it special?
As someone who's never actually had a webOS device, I've been given little reason to think about them, so I might just be missing how polished it is or something. This still points to a major marketing problem, though. HP hasn't told the world why it should care about webOS.
Couldn't you say that about any OS that's based on open source software? WebOS's big differentiator is things like UI, which are difficult to duplicate well.
At the root of it most problems drill down to basic engineering - lots and lots of it.
"The Plug-In Development Kit (PDK) is a component of the HP webOS SDK that lets developers use C and C++ alongside the web technologies that power the SDK, and even mix them seamlessly within a single application." -- https://developer.palm.com/content/api/dev-guide/pdk/overvie...
https://developer.palm.com/content/resources/intro_to_hp_web...