The value of pop-science books is not in their scientific accuracy but their carry-over to everyday life.
The overall points of Thinking Fast and Slow still stands whether backed by science or not.
It's also a great insight into how serious psychological research was done in the late 90s and early 2000s and how that field built many of its models and theories.
Definitely worth iｔ！ If your first read-through tended toward believing every statement as factual, make your second read a test of how well the evidence has held up.
You are reading HN. Do you think it is intellectually stimulating, then a first step to further research, or do you think it is «worth it» for scientific accuracy?