My best guess would be to contact someone from the study group directly via email and ask about obtaining an engineering sample for a potential commercial product (no really, they'll probably appreciate it). At this point the wood is likely still being produced in situ (i.e. a few guys making it in a phys/chem lab). The more interest is shown to them, the more likely they are to start looking at contracting the process out, thus making material easier to obtain and lower cost.

From what I've read, I'd expect it to behave similarly (in yield/toughness/hardness) to cast aluminum but with a tendency to split along the grain still, for machining purposes. So fairly hard, but not super ductile. The density will be in the same ballpark as magnesium if my math is right.

But... 'ecologically conscious' won't mean anything until production can be scaled up. When you're measuring things in raw carbon-footprint, it won't be able to break even with recycled pop cans merely due to the low-quantity batches they're processing now. It could be viable in mass production based on a previous article I read in Nature. The process seems simple enough that I could replicate it in my garage with some effort, so I think there's some potential there. It's just a question of whether it can beat traditional metals economically, with a slight edge in aesthetic appeal for your high-end customers.