Hacker News Reader

Comment by vanilla_nut | Hacker News Reader

Curious that external monitors are capped at 60Hz for all M-series processors (i think? the note about the Max is ambiguous). Especially when the internal monitor is 120hz. Or maybe that’s not actually the limit?

View on HN

They are capped at 60Hz at the resolution stated because the actual limiting value is the available bandwidth, and they are choosing to report the bandwidth in terms of "maximum 60Hz resolution".

If the limit is 6K at 60Hz, you'll be able to run 4K at >60Hz. My M1 MacBook Pro runs a 1440p monitor at 165Hz just fine over Thunderbolt 3.

We'll know for sure next week (or already just not me), but thunderbolt compliance means displayport compliance which means there should be no concerns along these lines. I'd be very pissed if I would be limited to 60 on these new machines.

The HDMI port can do 4K 60hz. The Thunderbolt ports should be able to do 6K 60hz or 4k 120hz.

Ah, thank you -- I feel like companies should publish a table of resolutions + refresh rates + number of displays to give you an idea of what's supported, instead of listing maximums that don't really capture the full picture.

Weird edge case, I know, but: using Thunderbolt 4, what is the maximum theoretical refresh rate I can get from a 480p display? 1000hz?

Why does anyone need more than 60Hz? Isn't the difference imperceptible?

If you haven't experienced 120hz, don't. It spoils you. You can't see much of a difference, but you sure can feel the difference in how things move and react.

Experiencing 120+ Hz spoils you. That said, ask me to tell you which screen is 120hz and which one is 165hz in a blind comparison, coinflip. Versus 60hz, just scroll a web page and you'll know instantly.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com