If by hyperinflation, he means higher inflation, I can see that. It's not uncommon for periods of lower inflation to be followed by periods of higher inflation.
Does Jack Dorsey know this? Or does he just think hyperinflation is just like saying gigamegaultrainflation++?
Isn't that trivially true, though? Even if there's zero causation, when `n` is closer to its minimum, the possibility space for `n`'s future is mostly above it.
I think so. I'm still surprised by how often it seems to be ignored.