It makes reading easier and writing faster. And no more time wasted on pointless formatting debates.
It makes reading easier and writing faster. And no more time wasted on pointless formatting debates.
> And no more time wasted on pointless formatting debates.
There will always be pointless debates: Naming variables, deciding which linters to enable, using reduce() vs. a loop, classes vs functions and so on. This is a cultural problem which occur because you're not focusing enough on the things that actually matter ("is the code correct?"; "can we safely ship this to production?"; "what's the long-term effect of introducing this abstraction/feature/capability?").
I love thinking about code as art, and I have numerous side projects which explores this, but when it comes to shipping real features on a deadline we need to create something which works, not something which evokes a good feeling inside me when reading the code.
I don't know, ask them? We here are on board with using them. ;)
I've met such problematic people. You can't reason with them, it's almost a religion.
But when you sell standardized tooling to your manager plus emphasize how this will reduce internal team friction, you can elegantly eliminate them from the equation.
I did it before and I plan on doing it again. We are here to write code and be productive, not to discuss aesthetics.