The Mysterious Case of the Covid-19 Lab-Leak Theory
newyorker.com
newyorker.com
Now, nothing really changed except a certain administration, and suddenly it's ok to discuss it and potentially investigate it?
Though I understand how some traditional media sources and social media companies (like many Americans) may have felt that Trump's reelection had to be stopped by any possible legal means (as per Time magazine's story), I don't understand precisely why suppressing the lab leak theory would need to be part of that.
A certain foreign government might have had interests in having the lab leak theory dismissed as a conspiracy. I'm wondering if The Lancet and Washington Post might have been swayed in that direction by investors/employees with double allegiances who were interested in said foreign government "saving face" so to speak.
That’s not a dig at either side though — it’s a dig at both. I’m for vaccines but I’ve heard “just look at the science!” from both sides and I know they’re both equally uninformed, because that is not how you determine credibility. It’s the dumbest line I hear consistently.
I’ll dig out the comment
When people talk about the "lab leak theory", usually they mean it was being studied in a lab.
No.
> SARS-CoV-2 is the only virus known to possess a furin cleavage site in its section of the coronavirus family tree. “We now know that there are full-length bat CoVs similar to SARS-CoV-2 that bind well to human ACE2,” Bloom said, referring to the Laos viruses, “but only lack the furin cleavage site.”
Yikes.