And German-language content can only be directed at German citizens or residents? There are five other countries which have German as their official language, and many more where German is spoken. It's ridiculous that the court would consider this sufficient to grant them jurisdiction.

> The website was accessible from Germany

That's something Germany could control much more easily on its own by putting firewalls at their borders. There is no reason for the site to go out of its way to block access from Germany, even assuming that they could do so reliably, which they can't.

> The explicitly offered worldwide service ("anyone anywhere")

Just like most web sites are available to "anyone anywhere". That's how the Internet is meant to work.

> There was a disclaimer directed at people not located in the US

Which is a very large group of people, most of whom are not in or from Germany. They're seriously complaining that the site reminded people that they need to take their own local laws into account before importing content from elsewhere?