But this is very much my point: we were sold a benefit-risk ratio that assumed the vaccines effectively curb transmission.
But this is very much my point: we were sold a benefit-risk ratio that assumed the vaccines effectively curb transmission.
Moreover, now that Delta is a thing, aren't the ethical issues nonetheless present.
> A recent study found that vaccinated people infected with the delta variant are 63 per cent less likely to infect people who are unvaccinated. [1]
> This is only slightly lower than with the alpha variant, says Brechje de Gier at the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment in the Netherlands, who led the study. Her team had previously found that vaccinated people infected with alpha were 73 per cent less likely to infect unvaccinated people. [2]
> What is important to realise, de Gier says, is that the full effect of vaccines on reducing transmission is even higher than 63 per cent, because most vaccinated people don’t become infected in the first place.
[0] https://www.newscientist.com/article/2294250-how-much-less-l...
[1] https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.14.21264959v...
[2] https://www.newscientist.com/definition/uk-covid-19-variant-...
"Here we regain our freedom"
"There will not be a 4th wave"
That's what we were sold. Anyone who questioned it was called an antivax conspiracy theorist.
And the worst part is, the namecallers still think they're on the right/smart side even after miles of backpedaling.
In late August it was announced that 80% of the Singapore population was now vaccinated against COVID-19.[1] However, in September and October there has been a dramatic surge in cases and deaths in that country.[2]
[1] https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/singapore-fully-v...
[2] https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/singapore/
https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/coronavirus-data-explor...
https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/coronavirus-data-explor...
It's like saying that flossing and tooth brushing were a lie because you had cavities after only doing either half of the month.
I get it, if beds are in use by severely ill Covid patients that means less beds for others... then let the bed owners decide how they wish to allocate bed usage, just like some doctors are refusing to see non vaccinated patients.
> politicians from one side of the aisle sticking their fingers in their ears, closing their eyes, and shouting "Nah nah nah I can't hear you!"
Politicians on the other side of the aisle are attempting to ban any COVID prevention measures at all. I agree that vaccine mandates aren't the only tool available to us, but it's hard to argue with the mandates when there are people fighting against mandatory testing, mask wearing, and social distancing.
This is the cult of safetyism. A total inability to process risk/reward and tradeoffs, and eschewing basic logic for "protection" whether real or imagined no matter the cost. All I sincerely ask to people such as yourself is, "What is your long-term plan? Is this forever for you?" Usually, I watch as their brains simply break down on the side of the highway. They have no answer because their logic is so bad they get stuck in an eddy with no way to get out. Welcome to the Church of COVID.
And no, conservatives aren't banning prevention measures. Everyone alive is free to get vaccinated (and wear a mask) as most have even in places like Florida. They're banning punitive rules, and whether it's Florida or Texas or all of Scandinavia, they've demonstrated that there are no worse outcomes from simply allowing people to make their own health choices without figuratively putting a gun to their heads (mandates) or making them do anything they don't want to (masks). Meanwhile, half the world upon seeing this: "Nah nah nah I can't hear you!"
Really?
https://abc7chicago.com/chicago-police-fop-john-catanzara-ma...
But then again, that's always been what I thought the policies should be since there was never any strong claims to vaccines preventing transmission.
I don't think you're in a position to lecture people about inability to process basic facts if your partisan screed depends on ignoring this to insist that "they don't reduce spread" is an established fact about vaccines. How is one supposed to debate with someone who insists the sun rises in the west, indeed?