Not sure what you mean by that. I dont know all the tools in the world, but generally a chipped tool gets less sharp. Even something like obsidian would get less sharp in regards to the intended use with a random chip as compared to a well knapped tool.
"cutting speed is a function that increases a machines' longevity."
I'm not sure you are using cutting speed the same way I'm talking about movement. Applying too much lateral torque to a router bit is how bits break, bearings wear prematurely, etc. You don't need much torque to move the router.
If you want faster cutting speed, then the RPM of the bit can be increased, or using a different bit design. You can cut faster and it still shouldn't require much torque for the movement.
I actually didn't have enough torque to move the router through lots of material until I moved to some fairly serious stepper drivers and configured them to use max current and voltage (IE, I got a 48V, max 20A power supply). Even then, if if accidentally move the router bit while it's not spinning into the work, the motors stall well before the bit breaks (1/4" carbide end mill).
Yeah, that makes sense. That sounds like it's really not that much torque the way you describe - just above functional minimum and no where near too much (eg people forcing it through and breaking bits).
A common problem that causes chatter and poor tool life is not taking a large enough chip. Large chips stabilize the tool (the rotation of the tool pulls it into the part) as well as allowing for a more continuous, uninterrupted cut (whereas too small of chips cause the flutes to have to re-engage the cut over and over, and the number of engagements and tool life have an inverse relationship).