Hacker News Reader

There is an important school of design thought that you should design for the people with the biggest handicaps, and by doing that you make it the best for everyone. E.g. If you're making a car, make it easy to get in and out for the elderly and then it'll be joyously easy for everyone else. Another classic example of this is the "Oxo Good Grips" range of kitchen utensils.

View on HN

You’re applying it over-liberally. That school of thought is to apply accessibility features that maximize accessibility for /everyone/ - eg, automatic door openers.

Features that improve accessibility for a subpopulation while decreasing it for the broader population are /not/ part of that thesis.

The topic of dyslexia friendly fonts falls somewhere in between. Some fonts are considered friendlier than others and are fine for the general population (verdana), others are friendlier to dyslexics but hideous to the general population (open dyslexia). I call it a gray area because they’re ugly, and do not improve readability for the general population, but not overtly inaccessible to the general population.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com