dang, can you elaborate on what you might be seeing in this post? with respect, it seems fine. I've read the article, read the comment, and read the guidelines, but I'm not seeing it. giving my most charitable interpretation, it seems like a (sane) commentary on the bonehead move by Mosley using the walgreen's deal as an appeal to authority and through that exuberance his cohort also invested - this is what is typically known as what the commenter described, so their comment makes sense to an impartial observer.
I get there is some prior history with this user, but I give you my humbled plea - it's Friday, let this one ride and let's see where it goes. Perhaps their prior conduct is coloring your interpretation of their progress - assume good faith.